Cette page regroupe l'ensemble des publications de Futuribles sur cette thématique (Vigie, revue, bibliographie, études, etc.)
This article is the third in the series started in June 2004 by Futuribles, in partnership with the Aleph group of the French Commissariat général du Plan. The aim of the series is to enlighten readers about what is going on in the area of futures studies and strategic thinking applied to public policy-making in other countries. As in the two earlier articles, devoted to Germany and Ireland respectively, the article focuses on the role of the wide range of bodies engaged in research and consultancy which are contributing to the design of public policies and to thinking about the political, economic and social issues involved in the medium and long term, this time in Sweden.
Sandrine Paillard describes the different agencies engaged in future studies in Sweden, stressing in particular their great independence of the political authorities. She shows, too, the key role played by future studies in the design of public policies as these agencies contribute to a better understanding of the issues on the part of the general public and encourage the various groups involved to work together in drawing up public policies.
Hugues de Jouvenel a présenté les intervenants et rappelé combien les questions de modernisation de l’État et d’État-stratège étaient récurrentes depuis des années sans que de grands progrès dans ce sens ne soient réalisés. Michel Drancourt a d’abord expliqué comment était née l’idée de leur ouvrage commun, "Service public. Sortir de l’imposture", à la suite de la lecture du rapport du Conseil d’État de 2003 rédigé par Marcel Pochard, qui faisait le constat que ...
(100 more words)
Robert Toulemon, a committed European, reflects on the future of the UN institutions, arguing that the UN family, which today lacks legitimacy and is no longer truly representative, would benefit from following the example of the European Union (EU). After a brief survey of the international context and the current deficiencies in the system of global governance - illustrated recently by events in Iraq -, Toulemon sets out a series of prerequisites for such a reform, including the need to recognize the rise of nations like the Republic of South Africa and to promote democracy and the observance of human rights throughout the world.
The first steps towards reform, in his view, would be to take account of peoples and not just states; that done, to recognize and define in institutional terms the right to intervene in a country's internal affairs, which would inevitably mean greater co-operation between Europe, the United States and the South; finally, to organize the reform on a regional basis, i.e. foster the development of large regional groupings as interlocutors within the UN system. In this regard, just as EU institutions have served as models for regional groupings elsewhere in the world (in Asia, Latin America, etc.), they could also inspire the reform of different parts of the UN and their relationships with each other. For example, the UN Secretary General's office could evolve into a collegiate body responsible for safeguarding international law (as the European Commission does within the EU).
Aware that his proposals could be dismissed as utopian, Robert Toulemon offers other detailed suggestions (for funding, governance, etc.) and considers Europe as a pioneer in promoting the new global compromise that he has described.
Venu exposer sa vision de l’avenir du système de santé français, Gilles Johanet a rappelé son importance pour le maintien de la cohésion sociale tout en regrettant les réels problèmes d’efficacité et les dérives budgétaires dont il souffre. Selon lui, il est désormais urgent de réformer le système. Le sujet est vaste tant il concerne tout à la fois la santé publique, l’enseignement et la recherche.
As a follow-up to the discussion forum on the draft Charter for the environment that the French President would like to include in the French Constitution, Olivier Godard provides us with a more detailed analysis of one of the most controversial aspects of the Charter, set out in article 5: the application of the precautionary principle. Godard is an acknowledged expert on this matter who has often written for us in the past. Here he examines the arguments of those who are opposed to the application of the principle as envisaged in the current version of the Charter - i.e. in a proportionate manner which can be altered over time as knowledge of the issues increases - and shows why their objections are not valid.
In the first place, according to Olivier Godard, the precautionary principle is the outcome of a perfectly rational approach, as he shows by taking the example of the epidemic of bird 'flu earlier this year. Moreover, including the principle in the Constitution does not detract from its relevance in any way: just because a norm may have accidental effects or be misused - and the risk that will happen cannot be ruled out completely - is no reason for it to be invalidated. Lastly, Godard demonstrates that the principle of proportionate precaution does well on the "reflexivity test", in other words, when applied to itself, the precautionary principle remains a guarantee of a balanced decision over the longer term.
In conclusion and in order to clarify certain controversial points, Olivier Godard proposes several amendments to article 5 of the Charter, as well as a detailed reformulation of the article.
In this opinion piece, Viviane du Castel surveys the current political and geostrategic situation in Russia following the overwhelming re-election of Vladimir Putin as President of the Russian Federation.
While representative democracy seems to be in a poor way, with opposition parties marginalized and the freedom of the press increasingly threatened, the economy is at a crossroads. A temporary halt to market reforms and a gradual "sovietization" of big industry is accompanied by major uncertainties generated by the clash between the Kremlin and the so-called oligarchs, who are seen as too powerful and too independent. Viviane du Castel discusses the range of options available to Putin during his second term, in which he holds all the political reins in his hands.
In terms of foreign policy, Russia's position today hardly differs from what it was under the Czars: it has to combine its ambitions vis-à-vis the West (i.e. Europe and the United States), the East (mainly China) and what the Russians still call "the near abroad", which this old imperial power cannot disregard for very long. Moreover, the Russian gambit towards China, the European Union and the Atlantic alliance - all now on its borders - can be seen clearly both in its direct international relations and in its actions in those areas that have often been viewed as an essential part of its outer defences: Kaliningrad, Moldavia, Ukraine, the Baltic states, the Caucasus and Central Asia remain the preferred regions where Russia exercises its muscle. Energy issues, for example, are a good indicator of Moscow's degree of influence on policy.
The real challenge for the country now is to achieve a balance among these three regional power games so as to maximize Russia's role and international influence.
Viviane du Castel provides here the keys to understanding the issues facing a Russian President who seeks to restore his office to the central role within the "vertical" power hierarchy that he wants to re-establish in the anarchic Federation that Russia is today.
Since the European Council in Lisbon in March 2000, the European Union gave itself the target of becoming "the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world" by the year 2010. A target which, according to the official line, would involve bringing the European research effort to 3% of the gross domestic product (GDP) by this time. Why this figure of 3% of the GDP? Part of the response lies in an extract from the 1964 work from the Plan, Considerations for 1985 (Paris: La documentation Française), which is reproduced in this issue. From 1964, the strategists for the French Plan estimated that in two decades' time, 3% of the gross domestic product should be devoted to research, in order to put France in a favourable position among international competitors and to make it a genuine rival for the United States -which was already showing this investment rate in the research carried out in 1964! They also insisted on the necessity of increasing research performance in France, notably with the help of an appropriate recruitment policy and the creation of "suitable reception facilities" which would incidentally provide researchers with the means to work efficiently.
In this article General Alain Lamballe, who has held many high-level posts involving international strategic relations, stresses how the English-speaking nations, especially the British, have succeeded in "bagging" key posts in international bodies, whereas senior French civil servants have tended to be relegated to lesser positions, partly through bad personnel management and partly through inadequate training.
In particular, he shows how the British manage to monopolize key positions, especially when important strategic issues are at stake, thus enabling the English-speaking countries to impose their views on the conduct of business.
By contrast, he argues, France's problem lies in French policy with regard to senior international civil servants. In his view, after their initial training, such people are not given adequate long-term training or moved around enough to acquire the range of experience that ambassadors and senior military officers, for example, require in order to cope with the issues of globalisation.
Denis Salas est venu à Futuribles pour débattre de la tendance à la judiciarisation de la société qui, après avoir touché les États-Unis, semble se développer également en France. L’intervenant a commencé par décrire ce phénomène, d’une ampleur assez inédite dans notre histoire politique. En effet, depuis Napoléon, l’ordre judiciaire s’est construit comme soutien de l’État. Cette structure pyramidale est une constante politique que le gaullisme a fortement renforcée, elle est aux antipodes de la ...
(10 more words)
Devant l'évolution préoccupante du déficit des dépenses d'assurance maladie (déficit de 11 milliards d'euros actuellement qui passera en toute hypothèse à 29 milliards en 2010 puis 66 milliards en 2020), le Haut conseil pour l'avenir de l'assurance maladie présente ses orientations pour une réforme de l'assurance maladie. Le conseil préconise notamment une réorganisation de l'offre de soins (l'activité médicale libérale comme celle des hôpitaux) « pour l'adapter aux besoins de la population ...
(54 more words)
Jean-Claude Casanova and Christian Bachelier have assembled and presented with a commentary a collection of the courses given by Raymond Aron, at the Sorbonne or the Collège de France, on Marx and Marxist thought. Jean-Jacques Salomon discusses the results of their work, published at the end of 2002 under the title Le Marxisme de Marx (Paris: Éditions de Fallois, 2002). He shows how Raymond Aron tried in his teaching to decode Marxist thought, to relate it to what was actually observed in society, and to emphasize how clearly Marx perceived (even foresaw) many contemporary problems. For Jean-Jacques Salomon, this was Aron's best book (even if he was not, strictly speaking, the author); it is an analytical tool that will be indispensable when there is -as there certainly will be, according to him -a "return to Marx".
Ce cahier du LIPSOR présente une démarche réussie de prospective stratégique qui a conduit à la réorganisation d'une agence d'État, l'ANAH (Agence nationale pour l'amélioration de l'habitat). Cet exercice, mené à un moment où l'évaluation des politiques publiques et la mise en place de la LOLF (loi organique relative aux lois de finances) impliquent une nouvelle logique en termes de fonctionnement de l'État, correspond à un enjeu de société d'actualité. Michel Godet ...
(431 more words)
Ce livre blanc du ministère des transports britannique est emblématique de la place de la prospective dans les décisions publiques d'aujourd'hui. Dès la préface de Tony Blair, et à maintes reprises, le message principal s'impose sans ambiguïtés : le transport est un sujet qui ne peut être traité que par une vision à long terme, par une stratégie pour concrétiser cette vision et par l'engagement du gouvernement. Le rapport mobilise des projections à long terme pour expliciter ...
(288 more words)
Ce chapitre est extrait du Rapport Vigie 2016 de Futuribles International, qui propose un panorama structuré des connaissances et des incertitudes des experts que l'association a mobilisés pour explorer les évolutions des 15 à 35 prochaines années sur 11 thématiques.