Le contraste est complet. Alors que concerts, cinéma et théâtres sont encore fermés en France à la date de parution de cet article, la grande enquête du ministère de Culture menée tous les 10 ans indique que — jusqu’à la crise — les Français sortaient de plus en plus pour assister à une manifestation culturelle, un concert ou pour voir un film. La Covid-19 a stoppé net cet élan, qui était une tendance notable de la société. En 1973, 6 % des ...
(encore 994 mots)
As in other countries, 2019 was notable in France for the regular mobilization of a section of the population to call the climate emergency to the attention of decision-makers and citizens. ‘Climate Marches’ repeatedly brought thousands of people on to the streets in French cities; young people (school and university students) initiated strikes and demonstrations to show their concern over global warming. These mobilizations are an interesting indication of the awareness of the issues and the demand for concrete action among a section of public opinion.
Yet is this mobilization significant? What is the overall position of the French public on climate issues? Are they ready to act concretely in the struggle against global warming? This article by Solange Martin — part of our new series on energy issues and climate change — shows how French public opinion is moving on these questions, with a distinct polarization on the issue and an increased risk of social tensions. It shows how far there still is to go before the ecological transition takes on any substance in France, both in public opinion and daily life.
With this issue 435 of Futuribles, we begin a new series of articles on energy questions and climate change — an enormous subject, the systemic character of which became clear to us when the French Minister of Ecological Transition Nicolas Hulot resigned in late August 2018. Hulot deplored the lack of greater — political and popular — support to enable real influence to be exerted on government policy and an ambitious project of ecological transition to be promoted in the face of the challenges posed by climate change. In this first instalment, we concern ourselves with the question of the actors involved in environmental questions: who are they, what weight do they have, and what are their actual motivations?
Daniel Boy, a specialist in public opinion and political ecology in France, offers a broad conspectus of environmental actors, from the supranational to the local level and ordinary French citizens, taking in national public bodies, elected or consultative, on the way. He shows, for example, what their positions are on ecological questions, how that has evolved, and how it might put them in a position to act (or not) in this area.
Si tout le monde a entendu parler du système de crédit social en Chine, qui vise à récompenser ou punir les citoyens en fonction de leur comportement, les algorithmes se développent dans d’autres domaines et pays avec une visée plus prédictive. Ce type d’outil implique systématiquement d’être alimenté par une large base de données. Au Royaume-Uni, 140 collectivités locales sur les 408 que compte le pays ont investi dans des systèmes de prédiction des problèmes de comportement ...
(1141 more words)
Ce livre sur l’évolution des valeurs des Français n’est pas un roman. Mais pour tous ceux qui s’intéressent à la dynamique du changement social, au-delà de ses manifestations mesurables à l’aune des statistiques de l’INSEE (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques), c’est une mine d’informations très précieuses tirées des cinq vagues d’enquêtes menées sur les valeurs, conduites en 1981, 1990, 1999, 2008 et 2017-2018 dans le cadre du programme ...
(826 more words)
For more than 35 years Futuribles has shown an interest in the evolution of value systems and the study of their transformation, regularly reporting the findings of the surveys carried out every 9-10 years as part of the European Values Study. The latest wave of such surveys was carried out in 2017-18 and Pierre Bréchon outlines the first lessons from these as they relate to France.
In the context of social crisis that has beset the country since November 2018, the long-term analysis Pierre Bréchon provides here on the evolution of French values with regard to lives and society, brings useful perspective. Without disputing the difficulties they may encounter in everyday life (in terms of incomes, jobs etc.), Bréchon stresses that, judging by the latest surveys, society is not in danger of falling apart in France, the values of tolerance and respect for others continue to advance, and happiness levels are as high as before and remain stable etc. Individualization continues to increase, attachment to the protective state remains as it was, political involvement is stable and religion still steadily in decline. However, the attitude to democracy is more complex and the demand for public order remains high. Though these last two points suggest that a certain vigilance is required to maintain French attachment to democracy and France’s political institutions, the results of the 2017-18 surveys run counter, more generally, to the ambient pessimism.
Dans Les Nouvelles Lois de l’amour, Marie Bergström propose une étude approfondie des applications de rencontres hétérosexuelles (p. 18) pour aller au-delà des voix médiatiques et sensationnalistes dominantes sur la question. Ces dernières affirment en effet que ces applications auraient profondément transformé le jeu amoureux en y introduisant des logiques économiques et des méthodes algorithmiques froides, désincarnées. La rencontre serait devenue un produit comme un autre, les rapports sexuels banalisés et surtout cette nouvelle ère des relations signeraient la ...
(919 more words)
Ce livre avait tout pour plaire : un titre accrocheur, un éditeur sérieux et l’un de ses deux auteurs mondialement connu. Lecture faite, la déception est grande. L’ensemble est superficiel, hétéroclite, complaisant et balloté par l’air du temps. Pour comprendre ce ratage, quelques détours s’imposent. Zygmunt Bauman enseigna la sociologie à Varsovie avant de rejoindre l’université de Leeds, en 1971, où il développa une pensée de l’émancipation humaine inspirée de Simmel, Gramsci et Arendt. Également ...
(753 more words)
Voir l’analyse détaillée de cet ouvrage par Pierre Bréchon dans le numéro 428 (janvier-février 2019) de la revue Futuribles.
This is a review of the latest of Ronald Inglehart’s books to be translated into French and a look at how his theory on the rise of post-materialism has evolved over the past 50 years. According to that theory, first developed in the early 1970s, generational renewal was going to lead almost mechanically to an advancement of post-materialist values (quality of life, personal fulfilment, democratic participation) to the detriment of the materialist values (order, security, economic growth) that previous generations were allegedly far more attached to. This theory is tested here against a very large number of surveys conducted worldwide which show, among other things, that the rise of post-materialist values has stalled as economic growth has slowed, that an overwhelming majority of individuals now subscribe to mixed values, and that these findings reveal the need to conceive the defining lines of these works of Inglehart’s differently.
However, above and beyond these critical thoughts on post-materialist theory, several major trends in socio-cultural evolution are presented here: for example, a rise in secular values but also in strong religious belief; a relaxation of morals and even more clearly a “feminization of society”; a rising sense of happiness and of adherence to democracy… None of this, however, excludes either the rise of populist or fascist movements or a rebellion on the part of the humblest strata of society against the richest 1%. Pierre Bréchon, as an expert in values studies, adds his voice to that of Ronald Inglehart to point out the strengths and limitations of surveys of this kind.
Constantly running beneath recent debates on the effects of robotization on employment (how many non-automated jobs will there be?) is the question whether modern societies are able to offer everyone a full-time job. Does working time necessarily diminish with technological progress and economic development? It is in order to answer this question that Jonathan Gershuny and Kimberly Fisher have studied the results of surveys on individual workers’ hours in 16 countries over the last five decades. In this article, they describe the trends that emerge with regard to work in the broader sense.
After looking back over the way aspirations and relations to work and leisure have changed since the 19th century (drawing mainly on Veblen’s theories), Gershuny and Fisher present the various surveys that underpin their analysis and describe their methodology. They then identify a number of major trends: a degree of historical constancy and similarity between countries over the last 55 years in terms of the time devoted to (paid + unpaid) work; a convergence in the trends among male and female workers and near parity between the sexes as far as time devoted to all (paid + unpaid) work is concerned; an apparent historic levelling-off of working hours around eight-and-a-half hours per day; and a reversal in the human-capital-related work-leisure gradient (the better educated now work more), which the authors associate with a growth in “exploit” as opposed to “industry” (to use Veblen’s terminology) within paid work in early 21st century societies.
Qu’y a-t-il de commun entre un gouverneur qui mobilise la garde nationale pour contrecarrer un coup d’État aux États-Unis, un justicier solitaire armé qui pénètre dans une pizzeria et une mobilisation populaire contre la proposition d’un sénateur italien ? Ne cherchez pas : ce sont les réseaux sociaux qui avaient propagé des nouvelles mensongères. Une manœuvre militaire interprétée comme une tentative de coup d’État de la Maison Blanche dans un cas, une affaire supposée de pédophilie à laquelle ...
(1043 more words)
Cet ouvrage présente 21 chapitres denses qui analysent les différentes facettes de la même enquête quantitative — baptisée Dynegal — qui vient compléter une précédente recherche . Les principaux sociologues, politologues, économistes qui, en France, travaillent sur les inégalités s’expriment dans ce très riche ouvrage, qui présente aussi, en annexe, l’ensemble des réponses aux questions posées dans l’enquête. L’objectif était de mieux comprendre les dynamiques de l’opinion publique. Au-delà du statut social et des revenus, quels sont ...
(914 more words)
Peu d’ouvrages en français se sont intéressés à l’histoire du Net. Il faut dire que le sujet peut sembler aride et passablement complexe. Si les légendes autour d’Internet sont plutôt connues, Arpanet, Tim Berners-Lee, etc., l’ensemble de la « généalogie d’Internet », pour reprendre partiellement le sous-titre de l’ouvrage, s’avère bien moins connu. S’attaquer à ce pan de l’histoire des télécommunications aussi bien que de la vie quotidienne de tout un chacun était ...
(681 more words)
Dans son dernier essai, Éric Maurin, auteur régulier d’ouvrages marquants et commentés (L’Égalité des possibles en 2002, Le Ghetto français en 2004, La Peur du déclassement en 2009 ), s’attaque au sujet du conformisme, de sa « fabrication » et de ses effets. En fait, l’ouvrage vaut surtout par la recension à la fois pédagogique et intelligente d’excellentes études menées tant en France qu’à l’étranger, qui concernent des champs variés allant du marché du travail ...
(1094 more words)
Voilà un livre qui tranche par son originalité et son sérieux. L’auteur est bien connu pour ses travaux nombreux et rigoureux consacrés au travail. Titulaire de la chaire d’Analyse sociologique du travail, de l’emploi et des organisations du Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (CNAM), il est notamment l’auteur, en 2007, d’un remarquable ouvrage intitulé Le Travail. Une sociologie contemporaine . Mais il s’agit ici d’autre chose. Rompant délibérément avec le nombre impressionnant ...
(736 more words)
In 2009 a programme –“Re-thinking Society in a Post-carbon Society”– steered jointly by the Foresight Department of the French Ecology Ministry and the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME), was launched in France. It is still ongoing and aims to produce a final report in 2013. The idea of a transition towards a “post-carbon” society includes four main objectives: reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to one quarter of what they were in 1990; near-autonomy with regard to carbon energies (petrol, gas, coal); an adequate capacity to adapt to climate change and, lastly, greater attention to situations of “energy precariousness”.
As part of the dossier Futuribles is devoting to this programme this month, Andreas Huber, Sébastien Girard and Pierre Le Marre lay out in this article the results of the studies they have carried out on “sustainable urban milieus”. After a presentation of the notion of “milieu” (based here on a segmentation using the Socio-milieus® method) and of the typology employed (nine main social milieus, three emergent milieus and 16 contrasting profiles), the authors show the extent to which individuals’ carbon footprints vary, depending upon lifestyles, and what a determining effect these lifestyles have in the fields of housing and transport. They then specify the various factors influencing behaviour in the direction of sustainable consumption (or not) and the different types of strategies of intervention that are likely to modify those behaviours. Lastly, they detail two targeted strategies, one aimed at the “precarious seniors” milieu and the other at the “eco-elite” milieu. Despite certain imperfections that remain to be sorted out in the study of sustainable urban milieus, these studies open up new perspectives for the development of sociologically targeted policies for a post-carbon transition.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are undeniably one of those subjects that do not provoke remotely the same reactions in North America as in Europe. Whereas the growing of GM crops is highly developed in the USA and arouses little or no controversy within American public opinion, this is an area in which Europeans are very cautious and even genuinely distrustful. As Daniel Boy shows in this article, drawing on Eurobarometer surveys of European citizens carried out over 15 years or so, there has never been a majority in the EU in favour of the development of GMOs for food production and, between 1996 and 2010, the proportion of those reluctant to see such a development actually increased. Above and beyond this general finding of a clear, sustained opposition among Europeans to GMOs in food, Boy shows the disparities that exist between the various European countries and presents reasons that may account for these differences.
Boy goes on to study the structure of European opinion in this field by sex, age and socio-professional category of the respondents, by their degree of “socialization” to science and their level of informedness. He also notes the importance of the level of knowledge of – and familiarization with – science in the attitude towards genetically modified foodstuffs. Lastly, Boy compares the attitudes of Europeans to GM foods with attitudes around animal cloning and the nanotechnologies, showing the great specificity of GMOs, which have been very distinctly and probably lastingly rejected (like animal cloning), thus blocking the development of this technological innovation in Europe. He nonetheless stresses that attitudes towards other innovations (such as nanotechnologies) in no way point towards similar failures in the future.
When one practices, or is interested in, foresight studies, it is helpful to have a good understanding of the past and, more generally, a clear vision of the way societies have developed over a long period. It is not, however, easy to decipher the historical process and it may appear difficult to add anything whatever to what has already been written by Hegel, Marx and many others on universal history. That is, however, what a Russian orientalist, Igor Diakonoff, has attempted in a book which appeared in Russia in 1994 and was translated into English five years later as The Paths of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Bernard Cazes has read this highly original work with great interest. Alongside an account of the atypical career of its Russian author, he presents Diakonoff’s re-reading of history here, driven as it is by the desire to establish whether certain non-material (in Marx’s sense) aspects, present in certain civilizations, were not found elsewhere. Diakonoff proposes a break-down of universal history into eight phases, the originality of this lying largely in the transition mechanism from one phase to another. This is based mainly on psycho-sociological (changes of values, for example) and technological factors (particularly in the field of armaments). Lastly, Cazes highlights the author’s comments on the finitude of our planet and his warning against the risks of extinction facing the human species in the relatively short term if nothing is done to check the course of history seen in its current, eighth, “post-capitalist” phase.
By the time this issue of Futuribles comes out, the now traditional international conference on climate change, planned for 28 November–9 December 2011, will have begun in Durban where the different nations will again attempt to agree to a series of measures aimed at curbing the warming of our planet. It is far from certain they will succeed in doing so, despite a diagnosis – recognizing global warming and its anthropogenic origins – that is shared almost unanimously by the scientific community. We say “almost” since a few scattered individuals – the so-called “climate sceptics” – still dispute the fact that climate change is happening. Futuribles has already (in March 2005) devoted a long “Forum” section to one of the emblematic figures of this tendency, Bjørn Lomborg. We return to the theme today by way of the analysis of Antonin Pottier, who examines the socio-psychological mechanisms underlying the climate-sceptical position.
Pottier distinguishes between two elements in the debate on climate change: a “diagnostic” component, including the observation of the warming of the planet, its causes (the emission of greenhouse gases) and its possible consequences (a scenario tending towards large-scale climatic upheavals), and a “prescriptive” part which, taking account of the diagnosis, proposes political measures and relates not to scientific observations but to a moral evaluation of the situation. After reminding us of what “fuels” the debate (the element of uncertainty which, Pottier argues, can relate only to the vision of the likely future that emerges from the observation of the facts, not to the description of the facts observed), he shows us that climate-sceptical arguments arise out of a confusion between diagnosis and prescription: it is because they reject the need for, or the content of, climate policies that they come to deny the scientific reality of climate change, shifting the ground of the debate and veering deeper into error. This posture is all the more harmful for being widely echoed in the media, tending to add a touch more confusion to the information available to the public: “Citizens’ perceptions of contemporary issues are skewed in favour of those interests that would be seriously impacted by a campaign against greenhouse emissions.”